<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"

xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssMod
ule">

<channel>
<title>Between Lawyers</title>
<link>/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</link>
<description>technology + culture + law</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>dhowell@gmail.com</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-07-13T06:34:36-05:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34" />
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>

<item>
<title>George Lenard On Facebooking Employment Candidates (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2007/07/13/george_lenard_on_facebooking_employment_candidates.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Here are <a href="http://www.employmentblawg.com/">George Lenard's</a> posts on the subject:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.collegerecruiter.com/weblog/archives/2006/09/employers_using.php#">Employers Using Facebook for Background Checking: Is It Legal?</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/more-on-using-facebook-et-al-in-recruiting-and-hiring/">More on using facebook et al. in recruiting and hiring (Part II)</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/employers-using-facebook-for-background-checking-part-iii">Employers Using Facebook for Background Checking, Part III</a></p>

<p>This might be better suited to <a href="http://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered</a> than Between Lawyers, but I'm posting it here anyway because it's a great series of posts.  One thing I don't see addressed:  one of the most powerful features of Facebook (and a host of other social networking sites) is the fine-grained privacy control users have over the visibility their data.  Often, only "friends" have access to the kinds of details George discusses.  But, lots of people do make their data more generally visible.  It's ironic that employment laws are such that though "the public" may be invited to view such information, lucrative damages awards or settlements could be associated with doing so in the context of employment or potential employment.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72489@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Web 2.0</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2007-07-13T06:34:36-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Agreeing To The Cloud (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2007/06/28/agreeing_to_the_cloud.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>As more and better communication and collaboration functions move to the Web (under non-negotiated, vendor-centric terms of use), what are our obligations as both tech- and ethics-savvy lawyers?  I for one am not about to give up Gmail.  So, what's the best practice?  <br />
<ul><br />
<ol>Shun Web services, you simply can't control the data?</ol><br />
<ol>Use Web services only when you have specific, confidentiality and reliability guaranteeing service level agreements?</ol><br />
<ol>Use Web services liberally, but acquaint yourself with the applicable terms of use and make sure clients are amenable?</ol><br />
</ul><br />
I lean toward #3.  You?</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72455@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Practice of Law</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2007-06-28T13:02:12-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Generations, Culture, And Corporate Communications (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/05/25/generations_culture_and_corporate_communications.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Our co-blogger <a href="http://www.denniskennedy.com/blog/">Dennis Kennedy</a> is quoted today in the New York Times:  <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/25/fashion/thursdaystyles/25intern.html?ex=1306209600&amp;en=d6be55156b07d13f&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss">Interns?  No Bloggers Need Apply</a>.  Dennis' <a href="http://www.denniskennedy.com/blog/2006/05/ny_times_on_employee_blogging_issues_with_a_q.html">interesting</a>, and I'm sure far more nuanced, discussion with reporter Anna Bahney was distilled down to a truth about modern attitudes toward personal values and employment &mdash; &quot;It's like, 'This is who I am.  Consequences are what they are. I'll go work for someone who doesn't have a problem with it.'&quot;  Just as she missed the chance to round out her piece with more of Dennis' well-considered insights on this topic, the reporter missed the opportunity to tell the more accurate, important, and complicated story.  Specifically, Ms. Bahney took the approach that the issue of individuals, their blogs, and their employers, is one of youth culture vs. Killjoy Lawyer III and co.  <em>E.g.</em>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[T]he line between what is public and what is private is increasingly fuzzy <em>for young people</em> comfortable with broadcasting nearly every aspect of their lives on the Web, posting pictures of their grandmother at graduation next to one of them eating whipped cream off a woman's belly. <em>For them</em>, shifting from a <em>like-minded audience of peers</em> to an <em>intergenerational</em>, hierarchical workplace can be jarring.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>(Emphasis added.)  While I appreciate the clever juxtaposition, and the point that there undeniably is a generation gap between the online mores of under-thirty-somethings and their elders, to suggest that <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/howell/141004812/">boundary blurring</a> of this sort is an issue unique to the young is to ignore at least the last six years of Web-enabled communications.  And to note almost in passing that &quot;some bloggers&quot; say &quot;[a] blog and a job don't necessarily have to clash,&quot; is to ignore at least three years worth (and counting) of <a href="http://www.thelongtail.com/the_long_tail/2005/12/announcing_the_.html">seismic shift in corporate attitudes toward communications with the outside world</a>.  Yes, it's a slow change.  But to suggest the change isn't happening &mdash; &quot;No Bloggers Need Apply&quot; &mdash; misses the boat, and here, I fear, resulted in an alarmist headline and a story that attempted to paint the varied picture of today's business attitudes and relationships with a two-color palette.</p>

<p>[<strong>Update</strong>:]  <a href="http://slashdot.org/articles/06/05/25/2027232.shtml">Slashdotters</a> weigh in.</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">58673@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blogging Policies</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-05-25T16:40:26-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>No No Na &apos;Net (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/04/30/no_no_na_net.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>There are a host of reasons (and probably a host of laws) why you wouldn't expect a prosecutor in a criminal case to blog tacky comments about opposing counsel and potentially inadmissible and prejudicial information about a defendant.  Notwithstanding, some <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1146139204085">recent events</a> have prompted the San Francisco D.A.'s office to specify &quot;that criminal cases and office business should not be mentioned on the Internet.&quot;</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">56851@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-04-30T18:24:07-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Survey Says:  Good Sense Prevails For Personal+Professional Bloggers (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/03/20/survey_says_good_sense_prevails_for_personalprofessional_bloggers.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Many, maybe most, weblogs involve some combination of personal and professional material.  In recognition of this fact, and in an effort to understand how people are striking this balance in the real world, <a href="http://blogher.org/">BlogHer</a> recently conducted a <a href="http://www.zoomerang.com/recipient/survey-intro.zgi?p=WEB224XQ27XBZB">survey</a> and gave a presentation at <a href="http://sxsw.com/interactive">SXSW</a>, entitled &quot;<a href="http://2006.sxsw.com/interactive/programming/panels/?action=show&id=IAP060031">We Got Naked, Now What?  Blogging Naked at Work</a>.&quot;  From the panel description:  &quot;Can you open your kimono in one blog post, and wear a button-down shirt in another?&quot;<p>

<p><a href="http://surfette.typepad.com/">Lisa Stone</a> <a href="http://blogher.org/node/3349">live-blogged</a> the panel, moderator <a href="http://workerbeesblog.blogspot.com/">Elisa Camahort</a> gives this <a href="http://blogher.org/node/3348">rundown</a> of the survey results, and The Washington Post has this <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/14/AR2006031401713.html">postscript</a>.  Among other things, the survey found the majority of the respondents &quot;draw distinct boundaries between public and private information,&quot; and (perhaps accordingly?) &quot;83 percent of professional bloggers who responded to BlogHer’s survey indicated that they had never received negative feedback to the personal opinions, feelings and experiences included on their business blogs.&quot;  The survey also showed the respondents, whether they self-identified as more &quot;personal&quot; or &quot;professional&quot; bloggers, shared a tendency to exercise judgment and discretion as to subject matter:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The top subjects that were considered not suitable for business blogging include romantic/sexual feelings (84 percent), salary/income (77 percent), religious/spiritual beliefs (63 percent), and sexual orientation (57 percent). Surprisingly, the personal bloggers were also likely to consider salary/income (68 percent) and romantic/sexual feelings (50 percent) off-limits. In addition, personal bloggers showed reluctance to discuss feelings about events at work (54 percent).</p>
</blockquote>

<p>No surprises there to me; you?</p>  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">53734@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blogging Policies</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-03-20T14:51:02-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Blogging Strategies From Texas To Tel Aviv (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/03/08/blogging_strategies_from_texas_to_tel_aviv.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://alanweinkrantz.typepad.com/">Alan Weinkrantz</a> will be giving a <a href="http://alanweinkrantz.typepad.com/alan_weinkrantz_and_compa/2006/03/corporate_blogg.html">corporate blogging strategies</a> seminar in Tel Aviv, Israel on April 4.  On the agenda, per the <a href="http://www.prnewswire.co.uk/cgi/news/release?id=165629">press release</a>:  &quot;How to start a blogging initiative. What are the elements of a successful blog? What types of blogs should companies consider creating? What steps should companies take to set up a blog? What guidelines should companies have for bloggers? Establishing corporate blogging policies...,&quot; and generally how businesses can best use blogs &quot;as a way to develop closer ties to all of their publics.&quot;</p>

<p>Also interesting in light of current <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/07/technology/07blog.html?ex=1299387600&en=d732c2af6bf280b8&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss">news stories</a> and <a href="http://www.edelman.com/speak_up/blog/archives/2006/03/a_word_to_the_w.html">discussion</a> is this from the press release:</P.
<blockquote>
<p> 'A comprehensive blog communications strategy includes targeting specific blogs with relevant information and keeping a close eye on what influential bloggers are saying about one's business, brand, products, competitors or industry issues,' added Rakefet Sudri, sales and marketing manager of PR Newswire Israel. 'PR Newswire has been assisting our customers in targeting and monitoring blogs for some time now.  ...'</p>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">52792@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blogging Policies</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-03-08T16:37:07-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Data about Metadata (Tom Mighell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/03/07/data_about_metadata.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Has this whole metadata thing got you down?  Does the recent <a href="http://www.floridabar.org/DIVCOM/JN/jnnews01.nsf/8c9f13012b96736985256aa900624829/c3f75b4e10e94f78852570e50051b23e?OpenDocument">Florida opinion</a> have you wondering which way to turn when it comes to the data that's hidden in your documents?  Well, it has Ben Cowgill thinking, too, and he has assembled a fantastic collection of resources to help you <a href="http://cowgill.blogs.com/legalethics/2006/03/making_sense_of.html">Make Sense of Metadata</a> -- the links include introductory material, ethical considerations (including links to relevant state opinions), metadata in litigation, and practical advice.  Great set of links there.</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">52704@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Ethics and Technology</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-03-07T19:32:41-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/</creativeCommons:license>
</channel>
</rss>