<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
  xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"

xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssMod
ule">

<channel>
<title>Between Lawyers</title>
<link>/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</link>
<description>technology + culture + law</description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:creator>dhowell@gmail.com</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2007-08-25T22:42:54-05:00</dc:date>
<admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34" />
<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
<sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>

<item>
<title>If It&apos;s All About Respect, Why Do They Look So Foolish? (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2007/08/25/if_its_all_about_respect_why_do_they_look_so_foolish.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>So &mdash; what <em>should</em> Nixon Peabody have done when its embarrassing firm non-theme song made its inevitable way <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howell/?p=183">onto the Web</a>?  (And into the atmosphere of countless homes and offices, as its <a href="http://www.ernietheattorney.net/ernie_the_attorney/2007/08/law-firm-jazzer.html">hapless victims</a> hum and mutter it against their will and better judgment?)  </p>

<p>If they'd have asked me (or perhaps 95% of the over 1,000 people who have voted in the Volokh Conspiracy <a href="http://poll.pollhost.com/T3JpbktlcnIJMTE4NzkyOTE5MwlFRUVFRUUJMDAwMDAwCUFyaWFsCUFzc29ydGVk/">poll</a>), I'd have told them the last thing they should be doing is invoking the DMCA.  Instead I'd have recommended:<br />
<ul><br />
<li>applying an appropriately liberal Creative Commons license,</li><br />
<li>holding a mashup contest, and</li><br />
<li>showcasing the winner and the top 9 runners up on the firm's home page.</li><br />
</ul><br />
Would make for more congenial <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howell/?p=184">search results and Wikipedia copy</a>, at any rate.  (But then again, at least the firm <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=reed+smith&go=Go">has</a> a Wikipedia entry.)</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72643@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Copyright</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2007-08-25T22:42:54-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>BlawgWorld 2007: An Introduction to the World of Blawgs (Dennis M. Kennedy)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2007/07/30/blawgworld_2007_an_introduction_to_the_world_of_blawgs.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>TechnoLawyer's new free eBook, <a href="http://www.technolawyer.com/r.asp?L11440&M1">BlawgWorld 2007</a>, features a selected post from 77 different law-related blogs. It's a good introduction to the current state of blogging for everyone, no matter what your familiarity, or lack of familiarity, with blawgs. You'll even find a choice post from the Between Lawyers blog.</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72539@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blawgs</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2007-07-30T22:25:35-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>George Lenard On Facebooking Employment Candidates (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2007/07/13/george_lenard_on_facebooking_employment_candidates.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Here are <a href="http://www.employmentblawg.com/">George Lenard's</a> posts on the subject:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.collegerecruiter.com/weblog/archives/2006/09/employers_using.php#">Employers Using Facebook for Background Checking: Is It Legal?</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/more-on-using-facebook-et-al-in-recruiting-and-hiring/">More on using facebook et al. in recruiting and hiring (Part II)</a></p>

<p><a href="http://www.employmentblawg.com/2006/employers-using-facebook-for-background-checking-part-iii">Employers Using Facebook for Background Checking, Part III</a></p>

<p>This might be better suited to <a href="http://www.overlawyered.com/">Overlawyered</a> than Between Lawyers, but I'm posting it here anyway because it's a great series of posts.  One thing I don't see addressed:  one of the most powerful features of Facebook (and a host of other social networking sites) is the fine-grained privacy control users have over the visibility their data.  Often, only "friends" have access to the kinds of details George discusses.  But, lots of people do make their data more generally visible.  It's ironic that employment laws are such that though "the public" may be invited to view such information, lucrative damages awards or settlements could be associated with doing so in the context of employment or potential employment.<br />
</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72489@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Web 2.0</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2007-07-13T06:34:36-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>In Like With Your Lawyer (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2007/04/23/in_like_with_your_lawyer.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>I was listening yesterday to the terrific <a href="http://www.calacanis.com/2007/04/14/calacaniscast-24-beta/">CalacanisCast interview with Dan Albritton</a> of <a href="http://iminlikewithyou.com/protected">iminlikewithyou.com</a>, and was struck yet again by the way indicia of reputation, trustworthiness, and credibility are shifting and quantifying.  I'm not sure what tomorrow's <a href="http://www.martindale.com/xp/Martindale/Lawyer_Locator/Search_Lawyer_Locator/rating_info.xml">AV rating</a> will look like, but I suspect it will be less subjective, more egalitarian, and more task-oriented.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72245@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Practice of Law</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2007-04-23T14:36:34-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>A Tip of the Blawg Cap to Blawg Review at 100 (Dennis M. Kennedy)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2007/03/18/a_tip_of_the_blawg_cap_to_blawg_review_at_100.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to the blawg carnival blog <a href="http://blawgreview.blogspot.com/">Blawg Review</a> for <a href="http://blawgreview.blogspot.com/2007/03/blawg-review-100.html">reaching its 100th edition</a> this week. </p>

<p>Blog carnivals are an interesting blog phenomenon, with a long history. Dave Winer has referred to a blog as "<a href="http://www.scripting.com/2007/01/01.html#theUneditedVoiceOfAPerson">the unedited voice of a person</a>," and blog carnivals turn that notion on its head, being "voices of many different people in many different places." However, that's what makes the blogosphere so rich - there are so many ways to create compelling blogs and blog content. In that respect, it's even more amazing to keep a blog carnival going for 100 editions (and even more in the case of some blog carnivals), especially as blog search tools improve and people increasingly consume information through RSS feeds and newsreaders rather than individually visiting blogs.</p>

<p>I know that I am not alone in saying that my favorite Blawg Review post remains <a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2006/06/blawg_review_36.html">Marty Schwimmer's highly-regarded Blawg Review #60</a>, which seemed as timely and incisive this morning when I reread it this morning as it did on the day it was posted. </p>

<p>Marty's money quote:</p>

<blockquote>This is an opportunity for the blawgosphere to assume a leadership position. It can be more than a compendium of firm brochures. Practitioner blogs can provide cool-headed legal analysis of issues such as the Niger Documents, Plame Affair, Torture Memos, NSA issues and Signing Statements, to a broader audience than the prof blogs can reach.

<p>Is it a poison for a practitioner to discuss politics? Partisan politics, yes.</p>

<p>However I don't see a downside in arguing for equal application of and respect for the law. That may even be one of those civic duties they may have mentioned at the bar admission ceremony.</p>

<p>I would hope that there is a centrist bloc of practitioner bloggers who simply want the truth to come out. Jack Nicholson is wrong, we can handle the truth.</p>

<p>So let's continually ask whether our Government is acting lawfully.</blockquote></p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">72135@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2007-03-18T10:52:15-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>New Bar Blogging Policy Emphasizes Cluefulness, Participation (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/11/15/new_bar_blogging_policy_emphasizes_cluefulness_participation.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Attorney and Chicago area blogger <a href="http://mhedayat.wetpaint.com/">Mazyar M. Hedayat</a> has drafted and released a <a href="http://dcbalpm.wordpress.com/blogging-policies/">blogging policy</a> for the <a href="http://www.dcba.org/">DuPage County Bar Association</a>, &quot;as well as any committee, firm, or bar association thinking of establishing blogs or wikis in order to foster communication with their members or the public.&quot;  It is a concise nine points in length, and I like every one of them:</p>

<p> #1 know and follow bar association guidelines for conduct, as well as the rules of good legal writing. no need to use Blue Book citations, but be accurate in your posts: others will look to them as a source of information and news, if not actual research.</p>

<p>#2 be mindful of what you write. remember that you have an audience.</p>

<p>#3 identify yourself and write in first person.  make it clear that you are not necessarily speaking for the bar association as a whole. be sure to disclose any information necessary to keep your statements from being misleading. use the following disclaimer on your blog or wiki with respect to all posts:</p>

<center><em>unless indicated to the contrary posts do not reflect the views of the bar association, its members, executives, staff, board, or committees, and are the opinion of the writer</em></center>

<p>#4 respect copyright and fair use. do not plagiarize. give credit where due by citing to the author of a statement or passage.</p>

<p>#5 do not reveal confidential information that could result in liability to yourself, your committee, other bar association members, or the bar association itself.</p>

<p>#6 do not comment on active cases or client matters by name except with the approval of those referred to in the post.</p>

<p>#7  do not use ethnic slurs, insults, or obscenity. Avoid writing about inflammatory topics solely to pique prurient interests.</p>

<p>#8 always try to add to a discussion constructively and ultimately to add value. do not let your ego get in the way. you are here for the good of the bar association after all.</p>

<p>#9 have fun. a blog or wiki can be loads of fun and a terrific way to share the best of your committee with the world. </p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">69189@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blogging Policies</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-11-15T17:42:16-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Are Blawgs Dead? (Dennis M. Kennedy)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/11/08/are_blawgs_dead.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Legal Internet pioneer Erik Heels is conducting an interesting experiment around the question: "<a href="http://www.erikjheels.com/2006-11-07-are-blogs-dead.html">are blogs dead?</a>" Take a look and help him with his experiment. </p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">68868@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-11-08T21:30:06-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lingua Blogga (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/10/25/lingua_blogga.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=35246">Martin Veitch, The Inquirer</a>:  &quot;[T]he day that the language of the billiards hall reaches such depths here, we shall be forced to leave the United Kingdom. &quot;</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">68025@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-10-25T16:38:30-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Julicial Eloquence (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/10/16/julicial_eloquence.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Julie Hilden of FindLaw's Writ neatly pummels into dust any credible argument for regulating lawyer blogs as advertising:  <a href="http://writ.news.findlaw.com/hilden/20061016.html">Are Lawyers' Blogs Protected by the First Amendment? Why State Bar Regulation of Law Blogs As "Advertising" Would Be Elitist and Reductive</a>.  "If we want the best arguments to win in court, why shouldn't we let the best bloggers win clients, too? State bars should affirmatively encourage legal blogs, rather than chilling them by regulating them as if they were no more significant than a banner on the back of a bus."</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">67431@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-10-16T18:27:55-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Forecast:  Hazy (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/10/09/forecast_hazy.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp?id=1160039129480">Unless you're our colleague Ernie</a>, that is:  "I don't want to put any disclaimers on my blog," said Ernest Svenson, a blogger better know as Ernie the Attorney. "It's a buy-in to a mindset that I want to go away."  Well said, as to what should by rights be able to remain <em>unsaid</em>.</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">66950@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-10-09T00:23:46-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Yet More Blawger-Unfriendly Lawyer Advertising Rules Contemplated (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/09/15/yet_more_blawgerunfriendly_lawyer_advertising_rules_contemplated.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This time in Marty's jurisdiction.   See <a href="http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20060915-7753.html">New York courts may keep lawyers from blogging</a>, via <a href="http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/">Recording Industry vs. The People</a>.  [<strong>Update</strong>:]  Also, <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/topnews/wpn-60-20060915StatesDefineLawBlogsAsAdvertising.html">States Define Law Blogs As Advertising</a>.</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">65558@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-09-15T17:48:24-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Blogs In Lexis (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/09/01/blogs_in_lexis.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.law.wisc.edu/blogs/wisblawg/">WisBlawg's</a> Bonnie Shucha reports that LexisNexis is <a href="http://www.law.wisc.edu/blogs/wisblawg/2006/08/lexisnexis_picks_up_blog_conte.html">now including a lengthy list of blogs (including this one) in its Newstex database</a>.  Yet another example of the paid online legal database companies tying their business models to the location of relevant information that already is online for free.  Makes me wonder how long it will take before a well designed, ad-supported free legal search competitor comes in and seriously syphons off subscribers.  Google undoubtedly does this already, even though it doesn't (yet) do vertical search.</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">64721@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-09-01T11:19:40-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Forging At Fordham (Denise Howell)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/08/31/forging_at_fordham.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>History in the making and participatory law in action &mdash; behold <a href="http://lawclinic.tv/">LawClinic.TV</a>.  From the press release:  &quot;Fordham University School of Law today became the first academic institution to launch a video blog or 'vlog.' The vlog, LawClinic.TV, features one-to-two minute videos of clinical law professors and students sharing their thoughts on clinical law education and written commentary from Fordham’s director of clinical education, Professor Ian Weinstein.&quot;</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">64688@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-08-31T17:50:03-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Ross Ipsa Loquitur Debuts (Dennis M. Kennedy)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/08/28/ross_ipsa_loquitur_debuts.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>This is cool. Legal technology wizard Ross Kodner has debuted his new blog, <a href="http://www.rossipsa.com/">Ross Ipsa Loquitur</a>. I know that it will be a source of great info. I've learned a lot from Ross and had a lot of fun presenting with him on legal tech topics. Welcome to the Land of Blog, Ross.</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">64517@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>Blink &amp;#8250;</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-08-28T21:08:14-05:00</dc:date>
</item>
<item>
<title>Lawgarithms Debut (Dennis M. Kennedy)</title>
<link>http://betweenlawyers.corante.com/archives/2006/08/24/lawgarithms_debut.php</link>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Between Lawyers' own Denise Howell has debuted her newest solo blogging effort - <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Howell/">Lawgarithms</a>  - on ZDNet.</p>

<p>Subscribed!</p>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">64271@/home/corante/public_html/betweenlawyers/</guid>
<dc:subject>BL News</dc:subject>
<dc:date>2006-08-24T21:41:45-05:00</dc:date>
</item>

<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/</creativeCommons:license>
</channel>
</rss>