Corante

Home > Weblog Columns > Between Lawyers
CONTRIBUTORS

Denise Howell Denise Howell
( Profile | Archive )

Dennis M. Kennedy Dennis M. Kennedy
( Profile | Archive )

Tom Mighell Tom Mighell
( Profile | Archive )

Marty Schwimmer Marty Schwimmer
( Profile | Archive )

Ernest Svenson Ernest Svenson
( Profile | Archive )

Denise Howell is a seasoned appellate and intellectual property litigator based in Los Angeles. Denise writes one of the first and most popular law-related blogs, Bag and Baggage, coined the term "blawg" and helped pioneer podcasting for lawyers. Microcontent obsessed since 2001, she is frequently quoted in the media on legal issues involving intellectual property and technology law. "Sound Policy" is Denise's show at IT Conversations, and it's also what she hopes results from the briefs she submits to court. Email Denise at dhowell@gmail.com.

Dennis Kennedy is a computer lawyer and legal technology expert based in St. Louis, Missouri. An award-winning author, a frequent speaker and a widely-read blogger, he has more than 300 publications on legal, technology and Internet topics, many of which are collected in his e-books. Dennis has been described as someone who knows almost every rock song in existence and, more importantly, how they apply to technology and law. Email Dennis at his gmail address.

Tom Mighell is Senior Counsel and Litigation Technology Support Coordinator at Cowles & Thompson in Dallas. He has published the Internet Legal Research Weekly newsletter since 2000 and blogged about the Internet and legal technology at Inter Alia since August of 2002. With Tom's singing, Ernie on guitar and Dennis' encylopedic knowledge of rock music, we may have the beginnings of a good band, if this whole blog thing doesn't work out. Email Tom at tmighell@swbell.net.

Marty Schwimmer left a partnership in the largest trademark practice in the world and founded Schwimmer Mitchell, a full-service IP micro-boutique in Westchester County, New York, where he represents owners of famous and not yet famous trademarks. He founded The Trademark Blog, the first IP law blog and the one with the most pictures. He is the first to come in and the last to leave in his firm. Email Marty at marty@schwimmerlegal.com.

Ernest Svenson practices law with a mid-sized law firm in New Orleans, specializing in business-related lawsuits. Most of his practice takes place in federal court, especially the Eastern District. He is best known for his weblog Ernie the Attorney, which he started as an experiment. Like many experiments it got out of control. Nevertheless, he continues to practice law and, occasionally, to seek enlightenment. Email Ernest at esvenson@gmail.com.
About this blog
Between Lawyers provides just-in-time group commentary on the issues raised when technology, culture and the law intersect. We take you behind the firewalls and conference room doors to show you how experienced lawyers deal with these issues and help you prepare for the new challenges we all face. For more, see our introductory post.
In the Pipeline: Don't miss Derek Lowe's excellent commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry in general at In the Pipeline

Between Lawyers

« Cyberweek and eLawyering | Main | Bloggers Poll On Miers »

October 26, 2005

I'm Interested In Learning The Truth About The Following:

Email This Entry

Posted by Lawyer X

CREATION OF THE ALLEGATIONS

Did individuals or organizations, including foreign agencies and governments ("Sources") fabricate documents purporting to relate to Iraq's attempts to purchase uranium (the "Documents")?

If so, did the Sources do so at the behest of, or with the knowledge of, or in conspiracy with members of the U.S. Intelligence Community or Administration?

Did the Sources do so in whole or in part in order to influence U.S. decision-making process with regard to Iraq?

INTERNATIONAL DISSEMINATION OF THE ALLEGATIONS

Did individuals or organizations, including foreign agencies and governments ("Transmitters") disseminate the Documents, or information citing the Documents as authoritative (collectively, the "Allegations"), in any channels, with knowledge of their falsity or with insufficient knowledge of their reliability?

Did Transmitters represent the Allegations as reliable, with knowledge of their falsity or insufficient knowledge of their reliability as being based on an authoritative source?

Did Transmitters disseminate the Allegations for the purpose of bringing them to the attention of U.S. policy makers?

Did Transmitters do so at the behest of, or with the knowledge of, or in conspiracy with members of the U.S. Administration?

DISSEMINATION WITHIN THE U.S. INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY OF THE ALLEGATIONS

Did members of the U.S. Intelligence Community or Administration represent the Allegations as reliable, within the U.S. Intelligence Community or Administration, with knowledge of their falsity or with insufficient knowledge of their reliability?

PUBLIC DISSEMINATION OF THE ALLEGATIONS

Did members of the U.S. Intelligence Community or Administration publicly represent the Allegations as reliable, with knowledge of their falisty or insufficient knowledge of their reliablity.

OBSTRUCTION

Did members of the U.S. Intelligence Community or Administration delay, impede, cover up, or conceal evidence with regard to the creation or dissemination of the Allegations?

Comments (0) + TrackBacks (0) | Category:


POST A COMMENT




Remember Me?



EMAIL THIS ENTRY TO A FRIEND

Email this entry to:

Your email address:

Message (optional):




RELATED ENTRIES
› New NY Advertising Rules Are Out There
› (Head)Hunting Season
› Best Wishes for 2007!
› Legal Services and the LongTail
› New Bar Blogging Policy Emphasizes Cluefulness, Participation
› Disturbing Study on Treatment of Minority Female Lawyers
› Are Blawgs Dead?
› The Gospel of Blawging